Socio-economic influences as correlates of adolescents’ attitude towards deviant behaviour

Tracy B. E. Omorogiuwa1, Kingsley O. Omorogiuwa2
1 University of Benin, Department of Social Work, Benin City, Nigeria 2 University of Benin, Department of Educational Evaluation and Counselling Psychology, Benin City, Nigeria

Korespondenční autor: Tracy B. E. Omorogiuwa (tracy.omorogiuwa@uniben.edu, tracy_4life@yahoo.com)

ISSN 1804-7181 (On-line)

Full verze:
Full version

Submitted:20. 4. 2017
Accepted: 25. 5. 2017
Published online: 31. 12. 2017

Summary

This study is focused on adolescent deviant behaviour in relation to the socio-economic influences. A correlational survey research design was adopted for the study. A sample of 540 adolescents from Secondary Schools in the Benin Metropolis was randomly selected for this study. A sample of 90 adolescents was randomly selected from 6 schools. Three experts determined the content validity of the instrument, and subsequently administered to 40 adolescents in a Secondary School, who were not part of the sample of study. After an interval of three weeks the instrument was re-administered to the same 40 adolescents. The data obtained from these two administrations was subjected to Pearson’s corre­lation statistic; and a test-retest reliability coefficient of 0.96 was obtained. The mean and standard deviation was employed to answer the research questions, while the Pearson product moment and the point bi-serial correlation statistics was used to test the hypotheses at a 0.05 level of significance. The results show that socio-economic contexts, parental income, peer group influence, adolescents’ gender and age are linked to adolescents’ attitude toward deviant behaviour. Recommendations are made to parents or guardians, child protection and helping professionals to engage in intervention measures in response to the phenomenon of deviant behaviour in order to improve the well-being of adolescents in the Nigerian context.

Keywords: socio-economic; adolescents; attitude; deviant behaviour; income; gender; age; peer

Literatura

1. Ajake UE, Etuk GR, Omori AE (2010). Child rearing style and brutal behaviour among senior secondary school students in Cross River State. Journal of Counselling Association of Nigeria. 4/4: 162–167.

2. Akpan MU, Ojinnaka MC, Ekanem E (2010). Behavioural problems among school children in Nigeria. South African Journal of Pediatrics. 16/2: 50–55.

3. Bamgbose O (2002). Teenage prostitution and the future of the female adolescents in Nigeria. International Journal of Offender Therapy. 46/5: 569–585.

4. Clark RM (2001). Homework-focused parenting practices that positively affect students’ achievement. In: Chavkin NF (Ed.). Families and schools in a pluralistic society. Albany: University of New York Press, pp. 85–105.

5. Fatoye F, Morakinyo O (2002). Substance use among secondary school students in rural and urban communities in South Western Nigeria. East African Medical Journal. 79/6: 299–305.

6. Hadjar A, Baier D, Boehnke K, Hagan J (2007). Juvenile delinquency and gender revisited: the family and power-control theory. European Journal of Criminology. 4: 33–58.

7. Iwuagwu TE (2016). Socio-demographic determinants of prostitution among female adolescents of secondary schools in Ogbadibo Local Government Area of Benue State. Journal of Science Teacher Association of Nigeria. 51/1: 1–13.

8. James HS (2001). The economic status of divorced women. New York: University Press.

9. Lasoncz I, Tyson GA (2007). Parental shaming and adolescent delinquency: a partial test of reintegrative shaming theory. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology. 40/2: 161–178.

10. Macionis J (2012). Society: the basics. Ohio: Pearson Education Inc.

11. Moffitt TE (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behaviour: a developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review. 100/4: 674–701.

12. Murray J, Farrington DP (2012). The effects of parental imprisonment on children. In: Tonry M (Ed.) Crime and justice: a review of research. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 133–206.

13. Osunde AU, Omoruyi FEO (2012). An assessment of school related deviant behaviour among secondary school adolescents: implications for citizenship development. Nigeria Journal of Education, Health and Technology Research. 3/2: 232–236.

14. Otite O, Ogionwo WO (2006). An introduction to sociological studies. Ibadan: Heinemann Educational Books Plc.

15. Patterson GR, DeBaryshe BD, Ramsey E (1989). A developmental perspective on antisocial behaviour. Am Psychol. 44/2: 329–335.

16. Rebellow RM (2015). Factors influencing deviant behaviour among adolescents. Indian Journal of Applied Research. 5/10: 583–584.

17. Svensson R (2003). Gender differences in adolescent drug use: the impact of parental monitoring and peer deviance. Youth and Society. 34/3: 300–329.

18. Tracy PE, Kempf-Leonard K, Stephanie Abramoske-James S (2009). Gender differences in delinquency and juvenile justice processing: evidence from national data. Crime and Delinquency. 55/: 171–215.