Daniel Lindner, Sophia Walsh, Tatiana P. Benoit, Christine Serzo, Susan Corradino, Renee Markowicz, Diane Persad-Kouril, Robert Sheilds, George B. Stefano
Graduate Program in Education and Neuroscience Research Institute, State University of New York – College at Old Westbury, Old Westbury, NY 11568, USA

Korespondenční autor: George B. Stefano (gstefano@sunynri.org)

ISSN 1804-7181 (On-line)

Full verze:
Full version

Submitted:11. 10. 2010
Accepted: 21. 4. 2010
Published online: 15. 6. 2011


In the United States there are an enormous number of high school research programs that demand the expertise of the educator and interaction with other labs. The Department of Health (DOH) has several important functions that must ensure the safety of this population. Among these functions is notably the necessity to become involved in health issues that would possibly arise in high school research programs. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) establishes guidelines of ethical standards that laboratories and researchers must follow. Considering the potential hazards, ethical guidelines fall under the broader umbrella of public health which will ensure the safety of the community of high school students in a laboratory setting. Transparency is critical in order to avoid potential unethical situations and conflicts related to high school science teachers in the laboratory and how they help to maintain a safe environment for their students. A uniform code of ethics should incorporate standards from established organizations that are applicable. It is important that NIH enforces specific guidelines to make sure ethical practices are adhered to. Health concerns must be taken into consideration in high school research, since the community is part of public health given the nature of the work being performed.

Keywords: high school research; public health; biohazards; experimentation


1. Committee for the Study of the Future of Public Health, Division of Health Care Services Institute of Medicine (1988). The Future of Public Health, pp. 23, 45–52. National Academy Press, Washington, D. C.

2. DePree CM, Jude R (2010). Daily Practice: Ethics In Leadership. 3(7): 19–24. Contemporary Issues in Education Research.

3. Greenberg RM (1987). Public Health and the Environment, pp. 86–87. The Guilford Press, New York, London.

4. Klass P (2009). The Marks of Childhood and the Marks of Abuse, The New York Times.

5. National Institutes of Health (2010). Ethics topics. Retrieved from http://ethics.od.nih.gov/topics. htm

6. Odin AW (1985). Health Services in the United States, p. 41. Health Administration Press, Michigan.

7. Patel K, Rushefsky EM (2005). The Politics of Public Health in the United States, pp. 14, 21–23, 28– 29. M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, New York & London, England.

8. Perdue University (2007). ECE438L – Introduction, Guidelines, and Ethics. Retrieved from http:// vise.www.ecn.pur­due.edu/VISE/e­e438L/lab0/pdf/lab0­.pdf

9. Porter R (2006). Presenting a Typology for Higher Education Ethics. 1(1): 6–14. Journal of Higher Education Ethics.

10. Shrader-Frechette K (2007). Taking Action, Saving Lives: Our Duties to Protect Environmental and Public Health, p. 197. Oxford University Press, New York.

11. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (1990). The Public Health Implications of Medical Waste: A Report to Congress, p. E.1–E.11. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Public Health Service, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Georgia.

12. Webster S (2008). How a Deweyan Science Education Further Enables Ethics Education. 17(8/9): 903–919. Science & Education.

Warning: readfile(http://www.xin.cz/xin/o.php) [function.readfile]: failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden in /var/www/journal-of-nursing-social-studies-public-health-and-rehabilitation/templates/templates.php on line 206