Social exclusion among problem drug users

Nikola Brandová, Alena Kajanová
University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Health and Social Studies, Department of Social Work, České Budějovice, Czech Republic

Korespondenční autor: Mgr. Nikola Brandová (nikusab@seznam.cz)

ISSN 1804-7181 (On-line)

Full verze:

Submitted:4. 3. 2015
Accepted: 5. 5. 2015
Published online: 31. 12. 2015

Summary

The survey report presents a summary of the acquired knowledge about social exclusion in the context of problematic drug users. The data are based on a secondary data analysis, in which scientific articles were searched for regarding the period between 2003 and 2014 in databases EBSCO, Scopus and PubMed. We used the following key words: drug users – social exclusion – addiction. We also used information obtained from printed expert sources and monographs. In the literature, there are two views on the connection of substance abuse and the phenomenon of social exclusion. The first one is devoted to social exclusion as a consequence of problematic drug use. Drug addiction enters into various aspects of the life of individuals; the problems emerging in the social sphere can lead the user to the margins of the society and social exclusion. The second view is focused on the opposite sequence of those phenomena – thinking about social exclusion as a cause of problematic use of addictive substances. Problematic drug users often come from poor and socially excluded communities. They have a restricted scope of choices and experience disadvantages. Socially excluded individuals rush to the use of hard drugs due to the feeling of detachment, alienation and hopelessness that they experience. The negative effects of drugs on users coming from socially excluded environment are more severe than from other users, because they usually have fewer resources which could help them cope with problems related to drug use. Both of the above views are closely linked, and in practice are connected.

Keywords: social exclusion; drug users; consequences of drug using; disadvantage

Literatura

1. Adams PL (2008). Fragmented intimacy: Addiction in a social world. New York, NY: Springer.

2. Ahern J, Stuber J, Galea S (2007). Stigma, discrimination and the health of illicit drug users. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 88: 188–196.

3. Buchanan J (2005). Missing links? Problem drug use and social exclusion. The Journal of Community and Criminal Justice. 51/4: 389–399.

4. Buchholz A, Krol A, Rist F, Nieuwkerk PT, Schippers GM (2008). An assessment of factorial structure and health-related duality of life in problem drug users using the Short Form 36 Health Survey. Quality of Life Research. 17: 1021–1029.

5. Byquist S (2006). Drug-abusing women in Sweden: Marginalization, social exclusion and gender differences. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 38/4: 135–145.

6. Dunbar D, Kushner HI, Vrecko S (2010). Drugs, addiction and society. BioSocieties. 5/2: 2–7.

7. European Commision (2001). Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

8. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (2009). An overview of the problem drug use (PDU) key indicator. Lisbon: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction.

9. Faupel CE, Horowitz AM, Weaver G (2003). The Sociology of American Drug Use. New York: McGraw-Hill.

10. Galea S, Vlahov D (2008). Social determinants and the health of drug users: Socioeconomic status, homelessness and incarceration. Public Health Reports. 117/1: 135–145.

11. Gee GC, Delva J, Takeuchi DT (2007). Relationships between self-reported unfair treatment and prescription medication use, illicit drug use, and alcohol dependence among Filipino Americans. American Journal of Public Health. 97: 933–940.

12. Glasser I, Zywiak WH (2003). Homelessness and substance misuse: A tale of two cities. Substance Use and Misuse. 38/3–6: 551–576.

13. Goode E (2008). Drugs in American society. 7th edition. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

14. Havens JR, Lofwall MR, Frost SD (2013). Individual and network factors associated with prevalent hepatitis C infection among rural Appalachian injection drug users. American Journal of Public Health 103/1: e44–e52.

15. Krüsi A, Wood E, Montaner J, Kerr T (2010). Social and structural determinants of HAART access and adherence among injection drug users. International Journal of Drug Policy. 21/1: 4–9.

16. MacDonald R (2006). Social exclusion, youth transitions and criminal careers: Five critical reflections on ‘risk’ The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology. 39/3: 371–383.

17. Mareš P, Sirovátka T (2008). Sociální vyloučení (exkluze) a sociální začleňovaní (inkluze) – koncepty, diskurz, agenda [Social exclusion and social inclusion – concepts, discourse agenda]. Sociologický časopis. 44/3: 271–294 (Czech).

18. March J, Oviedo-Joekes E, Romero M (2008). Drugs and social exclusion in ten European cities. European Addiction Research. 12/2: 33–41.

19. Ministerstvo práce a sociálních věcí (2011). Národní akční plán sociální inkluze a způsob jeho tvorby [National action plan for social inclusion and the method of its creation]. Praha: SKOK (Czech).

20. Mravčík V et al. (2013). Výroční zpráva o stavu ve věcech drog v České republice v roce 2012 [Annual report on drug situation in the Czech Republic in 2012]. Praha: Úřad vlády České republiky (Czech).

21. Národní monitorovací středisko – NMS (2012). Zaostřeno na drogy [Focused on drugs]. 10/4. Praha: Úřad vlády České republiky (Czech).

22. Neale J (2006). Social exclusion, drugs and policy. In: Hughes R (ed.). Drugs, policy and politics. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.

23. Neale J (2008). Homelessness, drug use and Hepatitis C: A complex problem explored within the context of social exclusion. International Journal of Drug Policy. 19/1: 429–435.

24. Radimecký J, Janíková B, Zábranský T (2009). Trendy na drogové scéně v ČR – Ohniskové skupiny s pracovníky nízkoprahových programů: Závěrečná zpráva [Focus groups with workers of lowthreshold programs: Final report]. Praha: Národní monitorovací středisko pro drogy a drogové závislosti, Úřad vlády České republiky (Czech).

25. Radostný L (2005). Faktory sociálního vyloučení. In: Sýkora L, Tmelová J. Prevence prostorové segregace [Factors of social exclusion. In: Sýkora L., Tmelová J. Prevention of spatial segregation]. Praha: Karlova univerzita (Czech).

26. Ryczkowska A (2009). Alkoholismus a sociální vyloučení. In: Problémy sociálního vyloučení – vybrané aspekty [Alcoholism and social exlusion. In: Issues of social exclusion – selected aspects]. [online] [cit. 2014–06–15] Available at: http://www.ropsopole.pl/…ad/Problemy_ wykluczenia_spo­lecznego-wybrane_aspek­ty_CZ.pdf (Czech).

27. Shannon K, Kerr T, Allinott S, Chettiar J, Shoveller J, Tyndall MW (2008). Social and structural violence and power relations in mitigating HIV risk of drug-using women in survival sex work. Social Science and Medicine. 66/4: 911–921.

28. Steiner J (2004). Ekonomie sociálního vyloučení. In: Jakoubek M, Hirt T (eds.). Romové: kulturologické etudy [Economy of social exclusion. In: Jakoubek M, Hirt T (eds.). Roma people: culturologiacal study]. Plzeň: Vydavatelství a nakladatelství Aleš Čeněk (Czech).

29. Todd J, Green G, Harrison M, Ikuesan BA, Self C, Pevalin S, Baldacchino A (2004). Social exclusion in clients with comorbid mental health and substance misuse problems. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 39/2: 581–587.

30. Watanabe-Galloway S, Ryan S, Hansen K, Husiek B, Muli V, Malone K (2009). Effects of methamphetamine abuse beyond individual users. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 41/3: 241–248.

31. Winkler J, Šimíková I (2005). Hodnocení Vládního programu podpory terénní sociální práce v sociálně vyloučených romských komunitách [Rating governmental support program for field social work in socially excluded Roma communities]. Praha: VÚPSV (Czech).