Visual and haptic contact of women with a stillborn baby

Kateřina Ratislavová
University of West Bohemia in Plzeň, Faculty of Health Care Studies, Department of Nursing and Obstetric Assistance, Plzeň, Czech Republic

Korespondenční autor: Kateřina Ratislavová (ratislav@kos.zcu.cz)

ISSN 1804-7181 (On-line)

Full verze:
Full version

Submitted:1. 6. 2015
Accepted: 30. 6. 2015
Published online: 31. 12. 2015

Summary

The paper deals with the possibility of visual and haptic contact of a woman/parents with a stillborn baby. It mentions the historical connection of the approach to saying farewell to a stillborn baby, and new findings about the influence of contact with a stillborn on women’s mental health after perinatal loss. Decision making on physical contact of parents with their stillborn baby is highly influenced by their natural need to see the child, but also by the behaviour, attitude and approach of the medical staff. The research results of the farewell ritual through visual or physical contact with a stillborn baby from the Czech Republic are considerably different from the data presented by specialists from “western” countries. Especially the approach of medical staff seems to have influence. The author stresses the provision of a free and informed choice for parents after perinatal loss, the right communication of medical staff with parents and the quality of visual and haptic contact of parents with a stillborn baby.

Keywords: stillbirth; contact with a stillborn; informed choice

Literatura

1. Avelin P, Erlandsson K, Hildingsson I, Bremborg AD, Rådestad I (2012). Make the stillborn baby and the loss real for the siblings: parents’ advice on how the siblings of a stillborn baby can be supported. Journal of Perinatal Education. 21/2: 90–98.

2. Cacciatore J, Rådestad I, Frøen FJ (2008). Effects of contact with stillborn babies on maternal anxiety and depression. Birth. 35/4: 313–320.

3. Cameron J, Taylor J, Greene A (2008). Representations of rituals and care in perinatal death in British midwifery textbooks 1937–2004. Midwifery. 24/3: 335–343.

4. Charles C, Kavanagh B (2009). Stillbirth and Neonatal Death. In: Chapman V, Charles C, editors: The midwife’s labour and birth handbook. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell Pub, p. 282–297.

5. Erlandsson K, Warland J, Cacciatore J, Rådestad I (2013). Seeing and holding a stillborn Baby: Mothers’ feelings in relation to how their babies were presented to them after birth – findings from online questionnaire. Midwifery. 29/3: 246–250.

6. Gravensteen IK, Helgadóttir LB, Jacobsen EM, Rådestad I, Sandset PM, Ekeberg O (2013). Women’s experience in relation to stillbirth and risk factors for long-term post-traumatic stress symptoms: a retrospective study. BMJ. 3: 1–11.

7. Haškovcová H (2007). Informovaný souhlas. Proč a jak? [Informed choice. Why and how?]. Praha: Galén, 104 p. (Czech).

8. Hughes P, Turton P (2002). Assessment of guidelines for good praktice in psychosocial care of mothers after stillbirth: a cohort study. Lancet. 360/9327: 114–118.

9. Komaromy C (2012). Managing emotions at the time of stillbirth and neonatal death. In: Earle S, Komaromy C, editors: Understanding reproductive loss: perspectives on life, death and fertility. Ashgate Pub Co, p. 193–203.

10. Koopmans L, Wilson T, Cacciatore J, Flenady V (2013). Support for mothers, fathers and families after perinatal death. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. Chichester, UK: John Wiley. [online] [cit. 2015–02–17]. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/…D000452.pub3

11. Rådestad I, Christoffersen L (2008). Helping a woman meet her stillborn baby while it is soft and warm. British Journal of Midwifery. 16/9: 588–591.

12. Rådestad I, Steineck G, Nordin C, Sjorgen B (1996). Psychological complications after stillbirth – influence of memories and immediate management: population based study. BMJ. 312: 1505–1508.

13. Rådestad I, Surkan PJ, Steineck G, Cnattingius S, Onelöv E, Dickman PW (2009). Long-term outcomes for mothers who have or have not held their stillborn baby. Midwifery. 25/4: 422–429.

14. Rådestad I, Westerberg A, Ekholm A, Davidsson-Bremborg A, Erlandsson K (2011). Evaluation of care after stillbirth in Sweden based on mothers’ gratitude. British Journal of Midwifery. 19/10: 646–652.

15. Ratislavová K, Beran J, Kašová L (2012). Psycho-social care for women after perinatal death. Journal of Medical Practice. 92/9: 505–508.

16. Ratislavová K, Beran J, Lorenzová E (2014). Women’s experience with a stillbirth in the Czech republic. Slovak Journal of Health Sciences. 5/2: 100–112.

17. Ratislavová K, Kalvas F, Beran J (2015). Validation of the Czech version of the perinatal grief scale. Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery. 6/1: 191–200.

18. Robinson GE (2014). Pregnancy loss. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 28/1: 169–178.

19. Säflund K, Wredling R (2006). Differences within couples’ experience of their hospital care and wellbeing three months after experiencing astillbirth. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 85: 1193–1199.

20. Warland J, Davis D et al. (2011). Caring for families experiencing stillbirth: A unified position statement on contact with the baby. An International Collaboration. [online] [cit. 2015–01–01]. Available from: http://missfoundation.org/…tatement.pdf

21. Wocial LD (2000). Life support decisions involving imperiled infants. Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing. 14: 73–86.


Warning: readfile(http://www.xin.cz/xin/o.php) [function.readfile]: failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden in /var/www/journal-of-nursing-social-studies-public-health-and-rehabilitation/templates/templates.php on line 206